Wacom and deviantART are proud to present the winners for Wacom's "Bring Your Vision to Life: Dreams" contest.

Artist's Comments
Tiny baby damselfly. Not staged or Photoshopped. To give you an idea of his size, he's on a blade of lawn grass.
5/17/09 Update: Oh my goodness, I'm in shock! I got a DD! Thank you so much to WaitingForTheWorms As I've told a few deviants, I really do like this one myself, but you know how it is when you download your photos and you wonder, should I upload this to dA? I'm really glad I did! Also, now I feel a little bad that I've complained about the DD system lately! What can I say? I'm overjoyed. Less than a year ago the only person who'd seen any of my photography was my sister and she kept telling me she loved it. I was positive she was just being nice. Because of dA, I can see I've improved. I'm self-taught and I intend to continue to learn from everyone at dA. I especially want to thank vacio-oscuro Daily DeviationGiven 2009-05-17Suggester wrote: "Beautiful and delicate, with excellent light." CommentsIt's tiny and there was a breeze. I just walked around getting different angles, focusing on its eyes. The blur is probably because of the breeze. I have photos that concentrate more on what the damselfly actually looks like, showing it's eyes and hair and everything in better detail, but I liked the feeling and colors in this particular photo.
|
Details
May 9, 2009
10.7 MB 58.8 KB 900×600 StatisticsCamera Data
Canon
Canon EOS 40D 1/128 second F/3.5 100 mm 400 May 6, 2009, 2:37:59 PM Share
Link
Embed
Thumb
|
Critiques
The depth of field does a beautiful job of enhancing the photograph - giving the foreground the extra sharpness it needs to pop out and really impress the viewers.
However one little thing bothers me - the image is unnecessarily wide. Now, I don't know if you're one of those photographers who don't like to touch anything that comes out of the camera (I call them naturalists) or otherwise, but I strongly feel that cropping this image a bit would have given it more impact. The wide background is somewhat distracting from the focal point, in this case the dragonfly.
Otherwise, you've done a beautiful job
Previous PageNext PageThank you for your Critique
You are not logged in.